Home > News > 2012 > September Headlines >
.
California Enacts Workplace Religious Liberty Protections Advocated by Adventists
.
Submitted: Sep 18, 2012
By Adventist News Network


The Seventh-day Adventist Church has long lobbied for increased legal protection against religious discrimination by employers. A new state law in California offers more protection for church members whose jobs are jeopardized by Sabbath observance, according to religious liberty specialists.
 
AB 1964 was signed into law last week by Governor Jerry Brown and goes into effect on January 1, 2013. It clarifies an employer’s responsibility to accommodate the religious beliefs and practices of employees under the state’s Fair Employment and Housing Act. Religious dress and grooming – such as turbans, hijabs and beards – now fall under protections granted by the legislation.
 
The new law also prevents employers from keeping visibly religious employees in back offices or basements. ­No longer will it be legal to segregate a worker from public view because their appearance did not fit a corporate image,­ California Assemblywoman Mariko ­Amada-Avis, author of the bill,­ said in a news release from her district office.
 
The lawmaker said the bill responds to changing demographics in California. Growing Sikh and Muslim communities in the state and nationwide have contributed to a recent uptick in workplace discrimination cases, the news release said. For Adventist supporters, the bill also ex­tends rights to employees whose religious ex­pression, while perhaps less tangible, is no less important.
 
The bill sends a ­clear signal­ to companies regarding their obligations to religious employees, said Alan J. Reinach, director of the Church State Council, a religious liberty organization of the Adventist Church in California. “­Hopefully, fewer Californians will lose their jobs, and Seventh-day Adventists will be more secure in their right to keep holy the Sabbath day,”­ Reinach said.
 
Enactment of the new law makes California the third state in the nation to legislate workplace religious rights. Previously, New Y­ork and O­regon passed laws with similar provisions.
 
Adventist religious liberty advocates have worked for years with an interfaith coalition to secure a workplace religious freedom act at the national level, but waning Congressional interest and disagreement over the scope of such legislation has tempered enthusiasm. Wayne Leslie, director of Legislative Affairs for the General Conference, says the new California law signals a grassroots approach to finding traction for workplace religious liberty protections. ­This is a big step forward for all people of faith,­ Leslie said. "­I commend them for pushing for this to get it done in California, and I’m hopeful that this will happen in other states,"­ he added.
 
Written by Elizabeth Lechleitner, ANN staff writer.

________________________
Share your thoughts about this article:

Angie Williams
2012-09-19 11:38 PM

Praise the Lord!!!

v. dan miller
2012-09-23 8:31 AM

Good!

Nathan Schilt
2012-09-23 11:09 AM

Can you imagine Jesus lobbying for laws to protect Him against private discrimination? I cannot imagine Christ expecting His followers to enlist the aid of the state against private employers to make following Him easier. Why is it the government's role to force private employers to accomodate religious beliefs? Religious liberty protections should certainly prevent the government from discriminating against a person on account of religious beliefs. But why should religious people be able to enlist the assistance of the state in forcing private employers to indulge their religious idiosyncracies? The Adventist Church's efforts in this regard have, in my opinion, been badly misguided. Why should Nordstrom have to give Sabbaths off to an employee who decides to convert to Adventism? 

Isn't it strange that Catholic employers. like Hercules Industries, are forced by the government to violate their consciences by providing their employees with health insurance that covers abortifacients and birth control? But as private employers, they are legally precluded from offending the consciences of their employees by imposing dress codes in the workplace?

Maybe if private employers would take a lesson from the mobs in the Middle East, they could get the Obama Administration to weigh in on AB1964, and condemn legislation that deeply offends the sensibilites of private employers. Maybe if the Catholics went to a few al Qaeda seminars, they could not only get the HHS mandate lifted, but could get the Administration to strongly condemn a mandate that violates their religious beliefs. My goodness! If the Administration is going to condemn free speech and artistic preferences, surely it could find time to condemn legislation that bans freedom of conscience!


Anonymous


You do not have sufficient permissions to post a comment.


Log In to Post a Comment. Log In | Register

Adventist Today Magazine is published quarterly by Adventist Today Foundation

Phone: 503-826-8600   |   Email: atoday@atoday.org   |   Web: atoday.org