Home > News > 2012 > March Headlines >
.
Atlantic Union College to be Location of Non-Accredited Training School
.
Submitted: Mar 1, 2012
By Adventist Today News Team

CORRECTED
 
An announcement was published yesterday in the electronic newsletter of the Seventh-day Adventist Church in North America that the Atlantic Union Conference executive committee has voted to use the campus of the college that it operated up until last year to start a “non-accredited … evangelistic and gospel medical missionary training school.” Since the 1930s, the denomination has sought accreditation for its high education programs due to the specific instructions of co-founder Ellen G. White.
 
Atlantic Union College (AUC) closed in July, 2011, after losing its accreditation from the New England Association of Schools and Colleges. A plan was announced last year under which Washington Adventist University (WAU) would operate a branch campus in Massachusetts and then that agreement evidently broke down.
 
“Since then, college officials have submitted an application to the state Department of Higher Education,” reported the Worcester Telegram & Gazette, “to re-establish degree granting programs.” The paper stated that Dr. Gina Brown, former dean of the School of Graduate and Professional Studies at WAU, has been “hired as an administrative consultant to lead the application process, which includes a financial audit of the 2010-2011 school year.”
 
“The college filed articles of amendment on Dec. 27 to offer bachelor’s degrees in theology/religion and health sciences/biology. The application is under review, according to a spokesman from the state,” said the story, which was also distributed nationally by the Associated Press.
 
The unaccredited training center, to be called New England Training School (NETS), will offer “intensives for pastors” and a six or nine-month program to train lay volunteers to conduct nutrition education and “very basic” health classes, as well as assist with evangelism campaigns. “It will not be medical training for doctors, nurses or other health professionals,” the local paper quoted Don King, president of the Atlantic Union Conference and chairman of the board for AUC.
 
There are no indications that the accrediting body had any negative view of the quality of academic programs offered at AUC. The concerns that led to the suspension of its accreditation had to do with the financial viability of the institution. The cost of the new training center “should be minimal,” the newspaper quoted King. “Most instructors will be teachers under contract from Adventist schools or current church employees.” A business plan is yet to be developed.
The announcement from the Atlantic Union Conference executive committee emphasized the potential for “a world-class international city evangelistic training school” to be developed “in cooperation with” the North American Division and the General Conference of the denomination. It quoted Ellen White, “The work in the cities is the essential work for this time. … Every member … should take hold of medical missionary work.”
 
When the General Conference decided to obtain accreditation for Adventist colleges in the 1930s it was, in part, due to White’s insistence, two decades earlier, that the denomination’s medical school prepare licensed physicians. In order to maintain this standard, it became necessary for the students accepted into the medical school to have degrees from accredited colleges. Today the denomination has its own accrediting body which has not applied for recognition by the United States Department of Education and it continues to obtain outside accreditation as well for its higher education institutions.
 

________________________
Share your thoughts about this article:

Kevin Riley
2012-03-02 9:45 PM

Of what use is a 'non-accredited' school?  Given that more and more any sort of health/medical worker needs to be accredited to practice, is there really much point in doing this?  I fail to see how any 'non-accredited' facility can aim to be 'a world-class international city evangelistic training school'.

Seminary student
2012-03-02 9:53 PM

Kevin , that is a great point . in the 21st century I see no use of this type of schools , We are moving backwards .we are back in the 70's .

Elaine Nelson
2012-03-02 10:49 PM

How many people would be interested in hearing such a poorly educated person talking about health?  There are many quacks currently advertising their services, but should Advenists become simply another?  Where will these graduates be "practicing" their learning and how can the possibly earn a living with such minimal education and skills?
Will they be in danger of practicing medicine without a license?  Advising people on health matters without sufficien qualifications is a dangerous pursuit.

Horace Butler
2012-03-03 8:20 AM

"Of what use is a non-acredited school?"  There is too much emphasis on accreditation, as if that were the main thing of importance in education.  If we had followed Ellen White's counsel for education the world would be coming to us for advice, rather than us going to them for accreditation.  Home schoolers all over the country consistently score higher in their SAT's and other tests than students who have attended accredited schools, so I'm not too concerned about the rebirth of AUC being accredited or not.  But if they don't get their priorities straight this time, they will not fair any better than they did in the past.

Elaine Nelson
2012-03-03 11:51 AM

Ellen lived in a different world; where the high school graduate was rare (she claimed to only have finished the third grade).  Today, even high school graduates are having a rough time finding work.

Home schooling for college?  I would hope the students at this proposed school would at least have a high school diploma.  What will they receive for their tuition?  Without future prospects for them, then what?  What and where are the suggested places for future employment?  The current unemployment rate of college graduates is 5%; for highschool graduates and drop-outs, it's much worse.  In spite of Santorum's rant of "elitist" colleges, he has three college degrees (don't do as I did, but do as I say.) 

Joe Erwin
2012-03-03 2:10 PM

Valid accreditation systems help to establish and enforce standards of performance. Without valid accreditation the ability to compare institutions on merit is diminished. My guess is that SOME kind of accreditation will be essential to functioning for any educational or training institution. How would any sort of student financial aid program work without some sort of accreditation?

Interested Friend
2012-03-03 5:01 PM

Per the final comment in the news story: I do not believe that the Adventist Accrediting Association (AAA) is in fact recognized by the US Department of Education as an accrediting body. There has been talk through the years about the church body applying to the National Advisory Committee on Intitutional Quality and Integrity (NACIQI), which is the body that would approve AAA to serve in a gate-keeping role, allowing federal student aid to flow to students at institutions it accredits. To date, no such application has been filed and it is doubtful that it would be approved in the present environment. An agency such as the Association for Biblical Higher Education (ABHE), which is DOE recognized, might consider an application for accreditation from NETS, but its curriculum would have to in every detail be based on the Bible. Student transcripts from an ABHE-accredited school would have very limited currency in the public marketplace.

Forrest Howe
2012-03-03 5:05 PM

"Since the 1930s, the denomination has sought accreditation for its high education programs due to the specific instructions of co-founder Ellen G. White."

White never led the charge towards accreditation.  In fact she was opposed to it.  Jesus was coming soon, so why waste our time with accreditation?  She was even opposed to CME being accredited and said so.  However several influential Adventists pressed the issue with her and told her that without accreditation, graduates of the medical school would not qualify as physicians.  As a result she changed her mind and sanctioned it.  The rest of the accreditation story came about in c. 1930.  The denomination was again told that CME would lose its accreditation unless its students came from accredited schools.  Education graduates were told they would not qualify for teacher certification unless they came from accredited schools.  So at that time, the schools reluctantly became accredited.  That was fifteen years after White died.  
 

Truth Seeker
2012-03-05 9:09 AM

Interesting that anyone who is no longer an SDA would be interested in voicing an opinion about the school.
I see no problem at all with the proposal and I have had some very close contacts with AUC in the past. Are we beholden to the Gentiles for our education programs? We should not be and I have confidence that there will be some guidance furnished and/or oversight by a responsible SDA body. I'm pleased to see the plans and hope, if it is God's will, that they will materialize.

Timo Onjukka
2012-03-05 10:52 AM

"Even your poets say...."

suggests strongly that we are not intended to live inside a cocoon and be unaware of what the world holds as 'truth'. How are we to engage the world if we do not understand it? 

 

Unless we wish to further marginalize ourselves cultish and absent reason...I see little virtue in trying to support such education. Pray that I am wrong, but this school has the hallmarks of being underattended, over-funded corporately in attempt to 'prove' a falsehood (that accreditation is unneccesary). Tuition will undoubtedly be prohibitively expensive absent public funding assistance through actual accreditation by recognized body, or be heavily subsidized corporately. Parents and students will undoubtedly and rightly question the benefit in light of added cost. The church may allocate funds to support this, at least initially, but again, is there cost/benefit parity (beyond, ostensibly saving face in the accreditation equation)?

Such a reactionary move for AUC-although seemingly unrelated to origins or evolution vs creation (and I believe ongoing actions against La Sierra has catalyzed this) will not be limited to just two of our institutions. PUC, AU, SAU...the temblors have only begun. AUC is first volley in the minor battle.


Jim Walters
2012-03-05 6:59 PM

I have been a professor at Loma Linda University for over 30 years and have served on the University Academic Affairs Committee for most of that time.  I notice that when the Western Association of Schools and Colleges schedules a visit, we scurry to beef up our programs to ensure accreditation.  WASC does not impose its mission on its accredited schools, but systematically determines if its institutions meet their own standards.  I long for the time when Adventist schools will set the standard, and not need to play catch-up.  But until then, regional accreditation is a godsend.

Truth Seeker
2012-03-05 9:14 PM

I can see no reason at all why SDA institutions of higher learning cannot be adequately judged by a panel chosen by church educational leaders. If they are not up to the task I would be both surprised and disappointed.

I agree there should be standards that are reasonable and compatible with SDA belief system.

Kevin Riley
2012-03-05 10:10 PM

Being judged by the SDA church is fine, until you try to gain entry to a public university, or even some other Christian universities.  When accredited institutions have worked so hard to build their academic reputation, to risk it by trying to treat unaccredited institutions as if they were the same would be foolish.  We should not really need outside pressure to ensure we aim at excellence, but unfortuantely it seems we do.  For training church members in how to do Bible studies, or evangelism - or even how to effectively fill most of the roles we hand out in church each year - an unaccredited school is a good thing and there should be more of it.  Training our pastors in various technical skills is also a good idea.  But if we are training people to work with the general public then we really need to make sure that the courses are accredited or we will end up facing all sorts of problems.

Horace Butler
2012-03-06 5:58 AM

This is not as difficult as it is being portrayed.  Home schools are not accredited in the sense that government or private schools are.  There are certain guidelines that must be followed, but much is left to the discretion of the parents.  When the students are finished they go take their GED exam.  Home schoolers generally pass with flying colors.  So, for those graduating from a Christian college without secular accreditation, it would be a simple matter to test the students before they go on to a public university.  And there would be an added incentive on the part of the religious institution to properly prepare their students for such things.

I still believe there is too much emphasis on accreditation.  It ties the hands of religious schools.

Elaine Nelson
2012-03-05 10:33 PM

An example of the importance of accredited schools from the current Economist:

Virginia's governor, Bob McDonnell, pushed a requirement through the legislature that women seeking abortions must undergo a vaginal ultrasound test which backfired and was later removed from the bill.  But he was embarrassed by his thesis as a law student in 1989 at a university founded by Pat Robertson, the television evangelist.  He argued that "feminists are detrimental to the family and that public policy should favor married couples."

BTW:  with Adventists so interested in religious liberty which has been in the news, why has no SDA law school developed?  Is there still the onus about law being beneath honest people?  Of course, the  G.C. employs many lawyers.

Truth Seeker
2012-03-06 9:11 AM

Horace Butler-
You are right on target. The sky won't fall if we loosen the grip of worldly accrediting organizations on our schools. With faith in God there are ways to accomplish worthy objectives without falling into the trap of seeking approval from those who are not of our faith.

Elaine Nelson
2012-03-06 12:07 PM

Writers need to ask themselves:

Would you spend money to attend an unaccredited college?
Would  you spend money for your children to attend an unaccredited college?
Did you attend an accredited college?
Would graduation from such an unccredited college enhance a resume?

Horace Butler
2012-03-06 6:22 PM

Would you spend money to attend an unaccredited college?--yes
Would  you spend money for your children to attend an unaccredited college?--yes
Did you attend an accredited college?--no--didn't know of any away back then
Would graduation from such an unccredited college enhance a resume?--depends.  I never needed a resume for any job I got.  On the job training was my resume.  Resumes are often overrated.  We've never hired anyone based on a resume.  There are better way to find out if a prospective employee will fit into the work environment here.

Elaine Nelson
2012-03-06 8:52 PM

One's future employment may not depend on attending an accredited college.  But, doing so WILL mean than one's future vocations will also be limited.  If that is satisfactory with
the individual and his parents, so be it.

But  the better paying jobs today do require more education than can be acquired at an unaccredited college.  Statistics show that college graduates have an unemployment rate of 5%, compared with higher rates for those who did not graduate, or worse yet, did no graduate from high school.  One's influence is in direct proportion to the education level.

How many leaders in Adventism today did not graduate from an accredited college?  How many physicians, nurses, business owners in your church never graduated high school?  Graduating college does NOT make on a member of the ELITE, only better educated.

If "there are better ways to find out if a prospective employee will fit into the work environment" how is that evaluated?  Will all employers give a prospective employee  an opportunity to "test" his work over a period of time?

Horace Butler
2012-03-07 7:27 AM

I'm just saying that one size does not fit all.  Education at a liberal arts college will not prepare you to be a building contractor.  On the job training and some good math and architecture classes at a local community college will.  It all depends on what one wants for a career.

Joe Erwin
2012-03-07 8:46 AM

I agree with Horace that "one size does not fit all." However, it seems to me that education in a liberal arts college is not accurately characterized as "one size." Many liberal arts colleges have schools of engineering, design, architecture, and some even have programs designed to educate in "industrial arts," "materials science," and even work experience programs designed to foster construction competence and management. I would like to see practical skills training and experience incorporated into all liberal arts curricula. There is a perception, I'm afraid, that a liberal arts education DISQUALIFIES one to manage construction or be a general contractor. I think that is a serious error.

That said, my personal impression, based on direct experience, is that community colleges, vocational schools, apprentice programs, OJT, are all exceptionally good values by comparison with private liberal arts colleges. Some combination works well for some people. It did for me. I developed many practical work skills while growing up on a remote ranch and while working at a variety jobs while in academy and at PUC. Further, my practical skills came in quite handy while I was in community college and while finishing up my undergraduate education at a good private liberal arts college--and increasingly, in graduate school, while doing post-doctoral research, and beyond, into the real, practical world of work.

Being able to design, select materials, and supervise construction of zoo and research facilities depended heavily on the practical skills I had learned along the way--but the opportunities to engage in these activities largely depended several aspects of my "liberal arts" education. My best jobs, and those where I succeeded best, were those that required a broad range skill and competence, including the ability to communicate effectively with management, labor, and clients.

I wish there were a way to convey to young people that getting a liberal arts undergraduate degree should not regarded as a "ticket" to life. Expensive liberal arts colleges seem to really be for the elite, I'm afraid. All too often such colleges seem to be, and are for some, playgrounds for spoiled children. Most public colleges are much less expensive and a much better value, even though some of them are also playgrounds or party schools. But ultimately, even if one's diploma and/or resume gets him/her through the door into the work place, competent performance is expected. It is what you do, not what your resume says, in most situations, until your resume lists many real world accomplishments.

I liked the emphasis at PUC on developing practical work skills on jobs that provided means of paying room, board, and tuition costs.      

Elaine Nelson
2012-03-07 11:46 AM

College teaches and trains for many industrial vocations and offers more than high school is equipped to teach.  And even for those students who want to "work with their hands" there are subjects taught in the liberal arts that greatly enlarge one's life:  history, literature, music that broadens the outlook and while the trades may make a living, these other areas make life worth living.

Anonymous


You do not have sufficient permissions to post a comment.


Log In to Post a Comment. Log In | Register

Adventist Today Magazine is published quarterly by Adventist Today Foundation

Phone: 503-826-8600   |   Email: atoday@atoday.org   |   Web: atoday.org