7 Questions for...Sam McKee

Editor's note: As part of our in-depth look at the Mission Catalyst Network of churches, we bring you our exclusive, follow-up interview with Epikos pastor Sam McKee. Part 1 of our provocative interview double-header is with Ron Gladden, director of Mission Catalyst. You will find it available in our Summer 2009 print issue being delivered to your homes this month. Not a subscriber? Click here!


 

By Marcel Schwantes 

In 2007, Mission Catalyst birthed a congregation dubbing itself as "non-denominational." The Vancouver, WA based Epikos (which translated from the Greek is "word" or "story") is another in a growing list in MC's network--an association of outreach-focused, grace-oriented independent churches that embrace the core beliefs of the Seventh-day Adventist Church. Epikos appears to separate itself from the rest, though. In the first interview with Gladden, I asked him if there was a "star church" in his network he likes to brag about. Epikos was a clear choice and perhaps fitting, since he is on staff as its "Directional Leader." But there was one problem early on, Gladden will tell you: Epikos had no lead pastor on the frontlines to produce maximum kingdom impact. So he went out and got one of the Adventist church's brightest young stars--pastor Sam McKee, formerly senior pastor of Sunnyvale Seventh-day Adventist church in Northern California. Problem solved--at least for Epikos. 

Epikos started as a worship gathering of six people in a living room. Its weekly worship now draws an attendance that sometimes reaches over 110. About 18-20 come from an Adventist background, many of those being unchurched for significant amounts of time. The stories of people joining have been called "amazing", like the story of rugby player Silas, who was recently baptized after meeting McKee on a football field. [watch video of ocean baptism

Pastor McKee paints a good picture of the Epikos story on another video that obviously targets the hip and urban unchurched of Vancouver. His simple and down to earth story-telling delivery, he'll tell you, is much like the core ethos of Epikos. He wants to enter into people's stories as a blessing, no strings attached, no agenda, in hopes that by blessing them, they might want to know about the Bigger Story--that of a God that loves them exactly where they are. The formula appears to be working, but is it sustainable? I asked McKee several questions that drill deeper into the mission of a Mission Catalyst church.

 

You left a successful pastoral position at the Sunnyvale Seventh-day Adventist Church in the heart of the Silicon Valley that, you've admitted, had a great staff, an open-minded Christ-centered board, and plenty of financial security. What could you not do at Sunnyvale that you are now free to do at Epikos?

I have to answer this on two levels. On a spiritual level, my wife and I felt an unmistakable calling to move to the Portland area to plant a church for the unchurched. We've always known that Ron Gladden would be the best mentor in our faith context for doing that. Ron has sat at the feet of amazing leaders from various parts of the Body of Christ and learned a great deal.
On a structural level, the Adventist Church has not been restructured in more than 100 years and the world has changed more in the past 100 years than in the past 1,000 years. People are not brand-conscious any more. Unchurched people are typically drawn to the church in their city that is changing the most lives and then they adopt the belief system of that group, whether it be Pentecostal, Calvinist or other. And the truth is that in most cities the Adventist Church is not the most life-changing church. And I don't think that's due to theology, I think it's due to methodology and structure and sometimes pride--that us-and-them mentality toward other Christians and the unchurched.

But the structural one is the clearest. We typically don't invest where God is at work. We often tax where God is at work to keep the dead edges and the middle management bureaucracy alive. Mission Catalyst is a flat organization where the vast majority of funds stay local on the front lines of where unchurched people live. In turn, local congregations are encouraged to give generously to support orphanages, churches and community service locally and abroad.

Pastors of other denominations in Sunnyvale were amazed at all the amazing things our church was doing. They were even more amazed when they found out that we sent close to $600k in tithe away and only got back 1.75 salaries. Other churches in town that were half our size had twice our staff and were able to do amazing things to transform lives and meet needs we couldn't even begin to address. We were hitting a glass ceiling with what we could do. And since I left I've heard from pastors from some of the top churches in the denomination saying they hit the same ceiling. They see God at work, they see the potential, they beg for funds and support to fuel the fire, but the structure doesn't allow for that. And it's not necessarily that the conference president isn't in tune; his hands might be tied.

Almost everyone agrees the system needs restructuring. There are churches from every possible doctrinal stand point who have stellar churches that leaders from all branches of Christianity flock to because they're so amazing at sharing Jesus. We don't see thousands of people flocking to an Adventist Church to figure out how to share Jesus with the world. They come to Adventism when they have cancer and they need the proton treatment at Loma Linda. They come to Adventists when they read National Geographic and they want nine more earthly years, not eternal life.

My conviction was that this unique and graceful, Christ-centered theology was not a hindrance that would keep a church from growing. It's a structural issue. In some parts of Adventism, it is a pride issue, an us-and-them mentality. But I think that prideful attitude is passing away in the new generation.

I hope that when our church plant goes well that it will open up new opportunities for some conference leaders to have the freedom to creatively innovate within the system and invest where God is at work and really pour their resources into a few powerful church plants in major cities within the system.

MC states loyalty to the Adventist message and mission, yet Epikos calls itself a "nondenominational Christian church" with ties to Willowcreek Association. Can you have it both ways?

What is the Adventist message and mission? Last time I checked, John the Baptist was an Adventist. His message and mission was to point to the One who was coming. He didn't point to himself or his organization and try and prove with charts and time prophecies that he was the real deal. His message was not "I am the right prophet and this is the right church. Let me tell you the five signs of the true church and why the other guys are wrong." It was, ‘Someone is coming who is so perfect and so amazing and so graceful and so powerful that I'm not even fit to tie his shoes. He's the way, the truth, and the life. It's not about me and my movement. It's about Him and His word.'

George Knight says that all organizations start out focused on a powerful vision and later on they get focused on maintaining the institution. It's the vision of Jesus' coming and His amazing, life-changing truth that we should be worried about and spreading that amazing grace to the ends of the earth.

The Willowcreek Association is a diverse community of Christians from various theological backgrounds who are learning from each other the best methodologies for reaching and transforming the world. There's no push for theological uniformity just a humble John 17 mentality that shows the world a united group of people who love Jesus. Jesus said that unity (not uniformity) would convince the world that he was real. (John 17:23)

On your website, "distinctives" like the Sabbath and the State of the Dead are incorporated into the core beliefs of Epikos, re-written in unchurched lingo. To clarify beliefs, are you teaching the fundamental Sabbath belief as a special test in end times (Rev.14:7 ) or simply as a day to "press pause" and physically recharge? (Gen 2:1-3)

Our goal is to prepare people to follow and serve Jesus in any and every context. I think professor Jon Paulien makes a great case for the Sabbath being an important issue in the end times. However, I would say that Adventists have over-magnified this in their discipleship. If the first coming is any example, the events leading up to the Second Coming may come as a surprise even to many of us who know our Bibles.

I've seen some freaked-out Adventists who spooked their neighbors and relatives with a myopic and strange focus on their take on the Mark of the Beast. Has it helped them share Jesus or has it hurt their witness? Has it made them more loving and their faith more winsome to their family, friends and neighbors or less? I think they wasted their breath talking about something that may or may not happen (their exact framework of the end times) when they could have been talking about something that did happen (the cross) and something that will happen (Jesus coming to right the wrongs and raise the dead.)


" I've seen some freaked-out Adventists who spooked their neighbors and relatives with a myopic and strange focus on their take on the Mark of the Beast. "

 

If we get people to fall in love with Jesus, grow deep in knowledge of His word and savor that day of grace every week, don't you think those people will be ready for almost anything evil can throw at them? Teaching people to be prepared for one type of battle leaves them unprepared for the variety that life will throw at them. Teaching them to love and follow Jesus will prepare them for any issue they face. (Take the prophet Daniel for instance. He was persecuted for simply praying as many believers in communist countries were persecuted for basic Christian practices. I know of some places right now that are facing endtimes-like situations that have nothing to do with Sabbath. There are atheistic regimes that are killing pastors for preaching Jesus. In Rwanda a few years ago, it must have felt like the end times. But the issue there was racial and tribal. The most relevant verse from Revelation for that challenge would have been where it says that ‘every nation, tribe, people, and language" will be gathered before Christ (7:9). That simple idea of every tribe being precious to Christ was the present truth they needed most to follow Jesus in that time of tribulation. Matthew 25 says that the testing truth at the end of time is how well we care for the least of these.

We need to show people how to read and understand the Scriptures and to live them out in love, no matter what the cost. Then they'll be prepared for anything. 

With respect to Adventist tithe structures, give some examples of how an MC church like Epikos manages its finances with integrity and responsibility?

For one thing, I never see the money and I can't sign checks! We have regular financial reports that are evaluated in staff meeting and we're working toward having our financials available for the church at large. People are more confident and inspired to give where there is transparency and they can see clearly that the money is going straight to the mission of blessing and redeeming people.

All MC churches are encouraged to give 10% to the network so new churches can be planted in other cities. We're also called to commit to establishing mission projects among the needy locally and abroad.

A couple from Epikos started an orphanage for AIDS orphans in a zero-income area of Uganda. We also support a Russian Orphanage. We take a group of teens to build a house in Mexico during spring break. 

What is one dramatic example of how the Holy Spirit has moved to further the mission of Epikos? 

I can't keep it to one. I have never been more scared or dependent on God in all my life. When I moved here, we had 15-20 people meeting in a library. I told God, "Unless you perform miracles everyday, we will fail." And God has kept his end of the deal. I could tell you the story of the tattooed rugby player who met us on the football field and a few months later was baptized into Christ in the Pacific Ocean (picture below). Or the Whole Foods store artist who was totally unchurched but now creates artwork in church while I'm speaking. 

We're not changing the world, but we're trying to transform one little part of it at a time. A few weeks ago, we had five out of the ten houses on our street at our church. Two of my neighbors have been baptized. Nine of them attend every week. At the end of this month, my State Farm insurance agent is getting baptized. My loan officer serves in our children's ministry and her four kids are getting baptized soon. It's a year later and we've got about 100 people coming every week and 50-70% of them were previously unchurched. 

Okay, the one story I'll tell you is this: A friend gave me an article in the local paper about a 14-year-old recording artist in our area. She has 300,000 plays on her songs on MySpace, and he said I should invite her to sing. I prayed about it and knew it wasn't the right time. So I filed the article carefully. (Actually it floated around my car for two months.) Then one day I saw it and felt convicted that she should sing at church that weekend. So I sent her a MySpace message. Meanwhile, this talented singer was pretty much unchurched. Her mom was a Christian but she spent weekends with her Dad who is anti-Christian. So out of nowhere she says to her mom, "You know I'd really love to sing in a church sometime." Two days later she got a MySpace message from a pastor inviting her to Epikos Church to sing. She came, she sang, and God kicked down the walls between Him and her. She said to me that night when I finished speaking, "I want to dedicate my music and my life to God and I want to get baptized at this church." I can't tell you how grateful we are to God for miracles like this. We're totally lost without Him and His grace. 

Can you see yourself ever going back to denominational employment, and if so, what would it take?

I would be happy to serve anywhere God calls me to serve. I thank God everyday that the Adventist Church shared Jesus and the awesome truths of His word with me when I was 18 years old. This has shaped my life and walk with Christ so much. I also thrived spiritually with the excellent professors at the seminary at Andrews University.

I still love speaking in Adventist settings but some of those doors have closed due to the innovative mission God has called my family to. It surprised me that at a leadership conference, they would have speakers from various backgrounds but rescinded the invitation for me to speak simply because some leaders in the bureaucracy are still upset with Ron. It reminds me of the disciples in Mark 9 who wanted to stop some guy from driving out demons in Jesus' name because he wasn't part of their organized group. Jesus said, "Whoever is not against us is for us."

A friend of mine who is one of the top VPs at Apple grew up with Rick Warren. He told me that some of the leaders of the Southern Baptists were ticked off at Rick when he set off to plant Saddleback Church because he wasn't going to have a denominational name on the sign. Instead of blessing him, they chewed him out and dissed him. Years later when he was successful, they basically said, 'We've been behind you the whole way!' I've had some amazingly institutional folk respond in negative ways but I've also had some top leaders in the Adventist Church tell me how proud they are of my wife and I for taking this risk for sharing Jesus and these unique biblical truths with people in a new way in this grassroots movement.


My wife and I will serve wherever God calls us to serve, and we're certain He's called us right here, right now, and we're loving it! 

You like stories. What do you value about the power of story telling as a way to minister to the unchurched?

Stories are powerful. And we want to listen to people's stories before we get to telling ours. We truly value what unchurched people have to say about life. Jesus spent 30 years listening before he starting public speaking. But when he began to speak, he told stories.

Matthew 13:34 says, "Jesus spoke all these things to the crowd in parables; he did not say anything to them without using a parable." Look around in most traditional church services, the most exciting part is the children's story. That's when every eye looks up and every one starts to listen. Everybody loves a story. In addition, in a postmodern world, a personal story is the best way to convey truth. In John 9, the blind man said to some skeptical folk, "I was blind, but now I see." How do you argue with that? So I tell stories when I preach, people in our church share their stories live and in video format. You can see and hear some of those powerful stories on our YouTube Epikos Church page.


To fully understand where Mission Catalyst is headed, and how they can reach exponentially more people for Jesus, click here to read the latest version of "The Pivotal Design"--a booklet that explains why some churches prevail and others fail.

Comments

Re: 7 Questions for...Sam McKee

There are so many interesting elements involved with the whole mission catalyst and Ron Gladden thing that one doesn't know where to start.

I went and read the new and improved version of the wheel document, The pivotal design, on their website. It sounded just like everything Ron has ever written on the subject. At least to me.

It usually comes down to him knowing the elusive secrets of success and everyone should listen to him. 5 years later and he says,

"The churches we started are strong in four or five of the vital components, but no single church was patterned after the pivotal design. They bounced heavenward, but they struggle to lift above the small church size."

What? No denominational structure or overhead, Congregational style, Keep the money in the local church for whatever staff and programs your heart could desire and everything else you wanted and still no happy endings?

"Stated simply, prevailing churches are effective at reaching normal Americans with the gospel message. They never stop making an ever-larger impact. Their success is ongoing and long term."

And yet with "all that freedom" ( remember their tag line?) they     "... bounced heavenward, but they struggle to lift above the small church size."

So no "prevailing churches" yet or I assume "churches of significance" either if one is using the old tag lines.

He also says that his former efforts looking for super pastors  has failed and they no longer look for "Super Pastors" however even his new "wheel" spends a great deal of time talking about what he now calls 10 talent Pastors.

He enumerates the aspects of what he calls a prevailing church.

What does the prevailing church look like?

The church ethos is unselfish: It’s all about the next person who needs to meet Jesus.

They understand and connect with the culture through music, technology, preaching, and the arts.

A high percentage of attenders have no church background.

Authentic Acts 2 community happens (largely, but not exclusively) through its small groups.

The stories of supernatural life change and radical discipleship are countless.

The church never stops reaching more people. Whatever the church’s age, it continues to grow.

The church has an increasingly significant footprint in the community. You can’t miss it."

Ok. Fair enough. Who could disagree with that right? Now read it again and ask what keeping the money local and being congregational have to do with each point.  I'll wait. NOTHING right?

Then to get to a church like that he says what must be done in fairly standard Gladdenesque ways, which he has covered before to one degree or another.

 A team of pastors working together. The team must be strategically assembled and certain characteristics must be present in each team member. A common set of paradigms the team holds about ministry, life, and God. The culture of the local church. etc.

Even his last point is the same as when mission catalyst was started.

A prevailing church is self-determining. Read congregational in every way. Money, staffing, etc.

On the final page he recounts an email he received from a Pastor I assume is still in the denomination. Quote

"I’ve listened to the same story hundreds of times. Even though each of the pastors has a different name, the tale is the same, and it always breaks my heart. This version is from Pastor Tony.20 His email note ended up in my inbox not so long ago. It said, in part: “I recently finished Bill Hybels’ book Courageous Leadership. When I put it down, I could not stop the tears. I felt an overwhelming sadness, because it hit me that I will never be part of a church like that. In the system, I will have some success here and there, but I will never have the freedom and the funds to build a prevailing church."

Take heart Tony. Ron has had all of that for over 5 years with the same result. Freedom and funds do not a successful church make even with rebranding.

My only real concern with mission Catalyst is that eventually in an attempt to validate his theories using the only yardstick he values which is membership/attendance, Ron will eventually dispense with even the pretense of adherence to Adventist doctrine or standards. After all, there are no practices to really prevent it even now. Freedom remember?

As to Sams McKee's Church. I hope they are having some successes. I hope something can be learned from all this.

It would have been better IMO had Ron built an actual successful mega-church and validate his theories and then do franchises rather than guinea pig his theories on church plants while he waits to start his own for 5 years.  It would have been insightful to know what advice he has given his small churches to transition to his revamped system. He used to say, if it wasnt in the DNA from the beginning it was neigh impossible.

 

 

Re: 7 Questions for...Sam McKee

This article reminds me that in July on the Mission Catalyst blog I asked:

"This quote struck me:

"5. Those who are persuaded of the Mission Catalyst theological perspective are not spiritually superior to those who attend any other Christian church. "

I don't really know what Mission Catalyst's theological perspective is."

https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=30082031&postID=757900672780958...

The only answer I got was from anonymous person who said to see their beliefs summary part of the website.

So Mission Catalyst is basically SDA without the remnant mentality...well maybe they still have a remnant mentality when I read the above article stating that  "outreach-focused, grace-oriented independent churches", if their doctrines are essentially SDA how is it that they are any more grace oriented then the SDA denomination?

It seems that they are beginning from a flawed perspective. There is something in SDA doctrine that is in fact not grace oriented. Changing the language of the summary of beliefs really does little to deal with the problem. Nor does claiming that John the Baptist was an "Adventist" some 1900 years before the term was invented. As long as mission catalyst refuses to see the reality that Adventism does have a contemporary meaning which is defined by the SDA denomination they unnecessarily limiting themselves. If they would at least admit they were Progressive Adventists we would at least know that they are seperating themselves from Traditional Adventism and we could understand more what they mean by grace oriented. As it is now they are obscure and using terms of no significance because they don't define them such as "mission catalyst theological perspective" or saying they are grace oriented as if there are other churches out there that don't think they are grace oriented. As even the most traditional Adventist probably thinks they are grace oriented. The reason I would disagree with the traditional Adventist chuches as being grace oriented is because of their theological perspective.

I applaud the effort but in reality if it was an alternative to Adventism it would I am sure have more reason to exist and to succeed.

 

 

Re: 7 Questions for...Sam McKee

Ron said......."If they would at least admit they were Progressive Adventists we would at least know that they are seperating themselves from Traditional Adventism and we could understand more what they mean by grace oriented. "..............reply...........Ron, you are either a Traditional SDA, or, you are no SDA, period. There is no such thing as a "Progressive Adventist" as you want to define it. It would be like trying to define a "Traditional Christian" as defined by the new testament and a "Progressive Christian" in a new and modern context. Either you are a "Traditional new testament Christian" or you are no Christian at all. You can not reform what is already stated and true. You can only oppose it and undermine its purpose and meaning. Bill Sorensen

Re: 7 Questions for...Sam McKee

Ron,

It wasn't conceived as an alternative to Adventism in terms of doctrine.

It was conceived as Adventism with no limiting factors. All the decisions and money local. In fact I dont know why Irv Taylor hasnt started one up himself.

Critics said the message would then be dependant on peoples affinity and attraction to a person (Rick Warrenesque) and not a set of ideas or beliefs and the church itself would fold if the superpastor died, moved on, or changed his beliefs.

It appealed to people like Dennis Plumbford who had written extensively about wanting to not send the tithe in. He was just sure if he only had more money he could build a megachurch too.

It also appealed to a Pastor who didn't like to move every so often. Some see themselves as dynasty builders.

Some just wanted to make a difference and Ron is pretty good about making it sound good.

The Pastor in this article was kind of vague about why he was drawn to a mission catalyst church. He better be right because calling your self non denominational and somehow still claiming you are Adventist and promoting congregationalism would be real hurdles in case it fails and he wants back in.

Re: 7 Questions for...Sam McKee

Hi Leahcim,

You state "My only real concern with mission Catalyst is... Ron will eventually dispense with even the pretense of adherence to Adventist doctrine or standards. After all, there are no practices to really prevent it even now. Freedom remember?"

It has not happened with doctrines in five years in spite of a plethora of such predictions.  Our safeguards are effective, although they are not what Adventist pastors are used to: a parental hand over them in the form of a conference. I would love to explain to you sometime the effect of freedom as it relates to mission and theology.

Ron Gladden

Re: 7 Questions for...Sam McKee

Ron Gladden has taught me more about being an effective pastor than any other person I've had the privilege of be mentored by.  I sat through many of the formative meetings of Mission Catalyst and have been in regular contact with him since.  One thing I can assure you of, Ron lives and believes closer to the Adventist message than the vast majority of SDA members and a large percentage of SDA pastor's too. 

If it wasn't for one discovery I made five years ago I would also be a part of MC (in fact I had planned to do so): the Adventist system is not the problem.  The key to success of failure is in the leaders working in our system.  If things had worked out differently and Ron was a conference president I guarantee that conference would grow and effectively reach the unchurched.  This is the one point my good friend Ron and I disagree on; he sees little to no hope for us in our current system, where I am optimistic because I am part of the system where it is working fabulously because of excellent leadership. 

I don't know why certain Adventist leaders threw such a fit when Ron decided to start MC.  The hope was this would be a self-supporting, independent ministry like so many others that are helping our denomination.  But, because he was going to use tithe to plant churches he was ostracized and his credentials were taken.  If accepting tithe for a purpose not originally blessed by our church is the crime, then Ron would be one of the few that should have a job in our denomination.  Our tithing system was designed to advance and facilitate church planting. 

Mission Catalyst should be aggressively wooed to return as a cooperative, if not fully recognized, partner of the Adventist Church.  Anything less is a major loss to both systems and is unbiblical. 

Love you Ron & Sam - keep building the kingdom!

 

Steve Leddy

Lead Pastor of 24-Seven Ministry Center

www.24-Seven.org 

 

Re: 7 Questions for...Sam McKee

I don't know all of Ron Gladden's theology. I do know that Joe Crews accepted tithe. I suspect that Amazing Facts still does. And how about John Carter? I would be surprised if he doesn't. And 3ABN as well. Is accepting tithe the sole reason Gladden was removed from the ministry? What is his theology? Bill Sorensen

Re: 7 Questions for...Sam McKee

Good for you Ron.  Keep fighting the good fight!  There is nothing like the energy of a church plant.  The trick is keeping it focused on the prize, a community of Christ followers empowered to ministry.

I'm so happy to see the term "Mega Church" dropped as a goal for church plants.  I observed a new church plant virtually killed because the plant pastor could think of nothing other than how he was going to get his mega church.  

Blessings,

Dilbert

 

 

 

Re: 7 Questions for...Sam McKee

Hi Ron,

I would have not skipped what I consider to be the heart of my thought. The part in the middle you left out. The part about wanting to be significant, a prevailing church, a church that never stops growing, a megachurch and the drive to accomplish that.

It seems that need has always been there and at some point everyone who wants something so badly eventually encounters a situation where they could do something and would probably result in more people in the seats, but their would be a sacrifice of standards. The heart of my paragraph was hoping that day would never come for you and MC.

How about answering my question about transitioning your current small churches into the new program?

You used to talk about DNA being so important from day 1. Whats the plan?

Re: 7 Questions for...Sam McKee

Amazing.  I've known Sam for a long time and count him as a fellow warrior in the battle against the gates of hell.  Church planting is hard work - I know.  This article was an interview with Sam - not Ron.  If one has issues with Ron, then sit down and talk with him.  This isn't the place.

Sam and Marcel, thanks for the great article.  Marcel, you've asked some great questions.  Sam, you've given some great responses.  As an Adventist, still in "the system" I applaud you and your family's determination to follow God's leading.

I've been to Epikos a couple of times.  It really isn't that different from other Adventist church plants around the country.  They are doing a lot of things right, they are growing, learning, and working hard to bring Jesus to the millions of unchurched people in the Portland Metro area.  In time such as this, with over 80% unchurched, isn't it time to support other's efforts, not tear them down.

Sam (and Ron), you go guys!

@gwalter

A not so perfect man with a Dad Attitude

http://bit.ly/gwalter

Re: 7 Questions for...Sam McKee

Discussions of relevance and theology aside, I will tell you why MC matters.  Because of of a MC church my husband, my best friend, and his brother all found a personal relationship with Jesus.  All three of these people have either been raised in the SDA church, or have had significant exposure to the SDA church.  It wasn't until they found a church who accepted them with no strings attached that they found interest in pursuing the God who loves them in the same way. 

 When one of them died unexpectedly this summer at age 31, his SDA parents have found peace knowing that he had finally discovered a relationship with God because of a MC church. 

 I would encourage everyone who has the time and energy to "worry" about MC to instead spend that time in prayer, or pursuing a friendship with your next door neighbor who could use an example of Christ. 

Big churches, or little churches.  THIS church matters to my family and friends, and it matters to God.

Re: 7 Questions for...Sam McKee

I don't currently attend any Mission Catylist church but I walked pretty closely with the small group durring the birthing of Epikos. I was very impressed with their hearts including Ron Gladden's. I don't think Ron is measuring "his" success by membership numbers, since I'm pretty sure its God's job to bless a church anyway he chooses. 

From my conversations with Ron I believe he genuinely wants to give people the Adventist Doctrine without being bogged down in an antique structure--one which I feel is slaved to the demon of instiutionalism and religiosity. 

MC churches undoudably face a lot of spiritual oposition since they could actually win souls to Christ, if they suffer from flash in the pan syndrome. If the institutional adventist churches don't flame out, it could be that they don't face heavy opposition since Satan doubtless doesn't concider them a threat. 

What I'm hearing in this complaint is that MC churches are wrong to update their presentation of the Gospel to win souls. Is the reverse then true of a church you would feel confertable with--they would rather stay the same than be effective?

Where the Spirit of the Lord is there is freedom, but if that freedom brings with it the possiblity of dropping a doctrine then freedom isn't welcome--thus banning the Spirit, right?

The reality is that we don't know right and wrong ourselves. We need to know God and take his word for what is right and what is wrong. Of course the bible contains truth but we read it from the perspective of our understanding of God. If we believe God is distant, angry, or condeming then that's how we read the scriptures--and that's how we write the doctrines. So every doctrine is man-made and flawed even though its bible-based. To place these doctrines over the presence of the Spirit is very suspicious. So is attacking a man for planting more churches. The Catholics tried to stamp out herassy once its called the inquisition.  

http://truesimplefaith.blogspot.com/

Re: 7 Questions for...Sam McKee

SirBunch

Good points. Here is another church working in the Lords vineyard. No focus on being a church of significance or a prevailing church if you prefer. And yet they are.

http://www.adventistfellowship.org/

South Tulsa fellowship began with a dozen people and has grown to over 600 in a little over the same timeframe. They started in 2000. To consider the contrast between where it is actually happening and where it is still theoretical on plan B, is not criticizing.

One looks at the differences to find which ones are actionable and can be reproduced to benefit all. One sees STF focus on the community and having high standards in terms of participation and evangelism with seemingly no thought to any of Rons limiting factors. One sees MC with a concern for the community but an absolute focus on structure and process.

We are learning from both. And BTW, no one has criticised Ron for planting churches. He worked in multiple conferences doing just that (and doing a fine job I might add) before he decided church plants should send the tithe money to him to be dispersed according to his personal requirements.

Many people dont know this but prior to his decision to start MC, church plant tithe WAS already being used exclusively for church plant support. In fact the Unions suplemented this with a matching grant for a time.

 

 

Re: 7 Questions for...Sam McKee

Sam,

Thanks so much for pursuing the call of Christ.  I think Gamelial had it right when he said, "If this plan or action is of men, it will be overthrown; but if it is of God, you will not be able to overthrow them; or else you may even found fighting against God."

So as one who doesn't want to fight against God, I will refrain from passing judgment.  

All I can say is, I wish you, Ron, and your team the best.  I pray the Lord will give you all a lasting ministry.  And from the stories you have shared, it appears that Epikos will stand the test of time...  And I pray many churches like it will also thrive. 

At the same time, I pray that the "institutional church" will thrive.  I believe there are people and places it has been called to reach.  It has it's place too, as I believe you would agree.  You simply went to Epikos because you were seeking to follow the call of Christ in your life... not to make a political statement.

Honestly, there is no system/ministry, MC or the Adventist establishment, Amazing Facts, 3ABN, etc... that is perfect.   We all have our challenges, strengths and weaknesses.  And we would do each other a great service if we would simply withhold judgment and pray for one another.  

Recently I came across this passage in James and it hit me right between the eyes...

“Do not speak against one another, brethren. He who speaks against a brother or judges his brother, speaks against the law and judges the law; but if you judge the law, you are not a doer of the law but a judge of it. There is only one Lawgiver and Judge, the One who is able to save and to destroy; but who are you who judge your neighbor?” (James 4:11-12 NAS95S)

As those who pride themselves in "keeping the commandments of God and having the testimony of Jesus," it suprises me that we are so quick to pass judgment upon one another, and upon what it is God has called our fellow brother to do, whether it be in the institutional context, or outside of it.

As I reflect, I'm reminded that the brethren did not originally look with favor upon what HMS Richards Sr. was doing with The Voice of Prophecy in its early days... but it thrived because God was in it.  And I pray that Mission Catalyst and Epikos will thrive because God is in them.  I pray that the institutional church will thrive because God is in it.

So let me pray just now, and leave it at that. 

"Lord Jesus, bless Epikos church.  Bless Sam and Ron and their whole leadership team.  Most of all, bless the many seekers who are coming to hear about Jesus for the first time.  Lord let their stories come alive with your story.

And God bless the General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists with all its various division, unions, conferences, and supporting ministries.  May it thrive, with health, vigor, and a passionate pursuit of making disciples for Jesus.

Father there are some who have seen Mission Catalyst as a threat to the greater Adventist church.  Some who fear it will fall away from the message we hold dear.  Father I pray that their fears will fade away as you bless Mission Catalyst and as You bless our institutional church.  I know You have the power and ability to bless both.  And I ask that You would.  Drive this spirit of fear from our midst and give us a spirit of power, love and self-displine. 

Yes, let the power we seek be the power of Christ's life, death, resurrection, ascention on high, ministry in the heavenly sanctuary, and coming in the clouds of glory.  And let the love that we give, be to those who feel called to live out the mission differently then ourselves.  And let the self-discipline that we practice, be refraining from passing judgment and leaving the judging to You Lord God.

Yes Father, search us, and know us, and if there is any wicked way in us, lead us in the way everlasting.  We need Your grace.  We need Your power.  We need Your love for each other.  So many times we find it easier to point the finger than to extend our hands to one another.  And yet you prayed that we would be one Lord Jesus...

Lord make us one, even if we don't all work within the same structure.  Give us patience  and understanding.  May we seek first to understand, then to be understood.  O Jesus, we need You.  We need You to bless.  Bless Mission Catalyst as it seeks to live out the Adventist Mission and Message, and bless the Seventh-day Adventist Church as it seeks to do the same.  And as you bless, me we all come to realize, we're on the same team.  That's my hope, my prayer, my desire... But most of all, with all of this... I simply say... Lord Jesus, Thy Will Be Done!   We Love You.  Amen.

Re: 7 Questions for...Sam McKee

I am among those who have said that the current financial system in the denomination needs to be changed, but it does not help that to happen to continue to make non-factual statements about the current situation.

McKee said "we sent close to $600k in tithe away and only got back 1.75 salaries." In fact, 1.75 salaries is about $200k, which would make an accurate comparison. Also, does the Sunnyvale Church operate or cosponsor a church school? If so about $40k per teacher of that tithe money is used to help pay the salaries at the church school. If Sunnyvale has a five-teacher school, which is typical for congregations of that size, that is another $200k. So the actual amount that Sunnyvale "sends away" is closer to $200k.

Actually there are additional complexities, but this is enough data to make the point. In fact, 86% of the tithe is spent by the local conference. Of the 14% that is spent by the union conference, the division and the GC, half goes overseas to pay for missionaries.

Re: 7 Questions for...Sam McKee

Well I can't say that I personally know Sam McKee or Ron Gladden.  Although in Sam's case I have friends that know him and have nice things to say about him as a person.  
What saddens me is that it appears that some feel limited by the Adventist message.  Since when is grace and living a life like Christ not part of the message we focus on?  In most churches I go to that is the primary focus.  However, the story of Jesus is one part of the Bible story and I don't want to limit my knowledge and understanding to just that when there is so much more to know.  From my appreciation of what Christ has done for me comes a desire to search for ever more meaning of what God has called me to do (admittedly most of this can be seen in the life of Christ).   I think the biggest problem is not with the Adventist message but that too few of us live a Christ-centered life.  The Laodicean message directed at our time is very applicable and our attitude is more a problem then our theology or tithe structure.  If SDA's live the values they claimed to believe in we would bring many in and scare many away, because a life devouted to Christ looks a little radical now days IMO.  
As for the tithe point.  God asked that we give a tenth to support the ministry.  In Bible times that was the Levitical ministry, and today it is that of the church (the whole church).  To focus on our one church is myopic and misses the big picture of what tithe money makes possible and what would be possible if more than 50% of SDAs actually gave a true tithe.   Besides, there is no limit on offerings and where they go.  Furthermore, money is not a limiting factor for God, only for people and how we limit ourselves and our understanding.  God has never and will never let an unchurched person not be reached because of money.  God has the all the money necessary to change the world, and as a blessing he has placed much of it in our hands so we can be blessed through our giving.  If we look at the stories concerning those with money in the New Testament, most ended up poor due to their support of the early church.  If we were less grudging in our giving, we wouldn't have to argue about tithe and how it is distributed because there would be more than enough money both locally and to send abroad.
Regardless of what may be some philosophy differences, I wish Sam and Ron the best in bringing people to Christ.  

Marcel Schwantes's picture
Marcel SchwantesMarcel Schwantes is the online editor and interviewer for Adventist Today. He is a Certified Personal / Business Life Coach and Trainer with a virtual practice serving clients across the country. His coaching and training niche focuses on improving relationships, communications, performance and the overall quality of life for individuals, groups and organizations. He can be reached at marcel@atoday.com